Monday, September 29, 2014

Lazy HR Professional Series: Free "Mercer" Compensation & Benefits Apps

29 September 2014, Singapore: If you are interested in regional compensation and benefits information, you should download and install the Mercer Compensation & Benefits apps (aka Mercer CBPAW) from Google Play.com

It provide basic information on most countries C&B statutory requirements and market practices.

Click the hyperlink: Mercer CBPAW


---The End--- 

Sunday, September 14, 2014

Lazy HR Professional Series: Talent Management Practices Wheel

14 September 2014, Singapore: I used this talent management model to share with my manufacturing management team as it provide a visible and logic diagram of how my HR Dept action items and strategic actions are supporting the new manufacturing production model.

Click the hyperlink for the source: http://sloanreview.mit.edu




--- The End ---

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

Lazy HR Professional Series: Local Plus: Gaining Popular Among European Organization

26 August 2014, Singapore: Based on my observation in the last 5 years, the concept of local plus is gaining popular among European MNC. I like to keep it short & direct - click the hyperlink. 

What is 'local plus'?
Click the hyperlink http://www.eca-international.com - articles about local plus

Figures & Facts about 'Local Plus' from Mercer
Click the hyperlink http://mthink.mercer.com - graphic info about local plus
(Source from Mercer)

--- The End ---




Friday, August 15, 2014

The Power of Social Media: Look Up

15 August 2014, Singapore: Today, one of my Germany colleague manager shared with me this Youtube video ... entitled 'Look-Up'. It is a very beautiful video about how the smart phone technology is making us our less human and less friends ... From a HR perspective ... how do we start engage our workforce to be more human! 

Click the hyperlink: "Look Up"


-- The End --

Saturday, August 9, 2014

Three Reasons Performance Management will Change ....

09 August 2014, Singapore: This is an article worth reading. It is written by Sylvia Vorhauser-Smith. It is not my usual "short & sweet" but a bit lengthy. Happy reading!

Click the hyperlink if you want to read it from the source: 3 Reason Performance Management will Change in 2013


Three Reasons Performance Management will Change in 2013
By Sylvia Vorhauser-Smith

Is there any organizational practice more broken than performance management? Not if you concur with Marc Effron & Miriam Ort who state “perhaps no talent management process is more important or more reviled than performance management.” In fact, it draws universal agreement on several fronts:

  • everyone hates it – employees and managers alike
  • nobody does it well – it’s a skill that seemingly fails to be acquired despite exhaustive training efforts, and
  • it fails the test of construct validity – it doesn't do what it was designed to do, i.e. increase performance


Traditional performance management programs have become organization wallpaper. They exist in the background with little or no expectations for impact. Yet despite its poor popularity, the concept of performance (at an individual and organizational level) is critical to business success. It can’t just be ignored.

Why is it so broken?

In a large survey conducted by WorldatWork, 58% of organizations rated their performance management systems as “C Grade or below.” That gets a giggle. The performance management process itself gets subjected to its own methods of setting criteria and rating performance against them – and fails.

I believe there are three reasons almost all current performance management systems are broken:

  1. People have changed
  2. Technology has changed
  3. People’s relationship with their technology has changed


Repairing the damage?  In order to compete in today’s market, companies must move to adopt a much more agile performance management approach.

People HAVE CHANGED

Employee expectations have changed. It’s not just Gen Y – employees everywhere and of every generation expect more. More involvement, more accountability, and more transparency. When it comes to managing their performance, employees have shifted from being passive recipients to active agents. Not satisfied with a one-way download of performance feedback, employees want to participate in the performance data collection process. And they liken the ‘annual event’ of a performance review to arriving at the pearly gates on Judgment Day.

Managers have changed too. Command and control is no longer cutting it – managers are expected to guide and coach, provide balanced constructive feedback and inspire, rather than enforce, performance.

Add to that what science is now telling us about what really drives human motivation. Like, goal pursuit motivates performance much more than goal achievement, peak performance is best achieved in states of flow, and multi-tasking only dilutes performance on all tasks undertaken concurrently.

Key Changes for High Performance?

Paradigm shift. What used to work no longer does. Managers need to:

1) be real – communicate openly and often.
2) set stretch goals and inspire individuals to work to their potential.
3)  get out of the way – trust their teams and empower employees with accountability.

Technology HAS CHANGED

We’re reaching a tipping point for technology in the talent management arena. It began with simple automation: take the paper processes and put them on a computer. Fine, but that left us with so many spreadsheets, Word templates, proprietary systems and disconnected point solutions that we were drowning in complexity and data overload. It also highlighted that many of the processes we were automating actually needed to be revised, simplified or eliminated altogether.

Baffled by the complexity we created, focus in recent years has been on process simplification, user-friendliness and redirecting attention to what actually matters. A good step forward, but we still suffer from too much data, too little meaningful information.

The “big data & analytics movement” has now really raised the bar – not just in terms of what data can be gathered, aggregated and analyzed but also how it is filtered and presented to audiences to provide immediate management insights. Activity lists are being replaced by composite dashboards, lengthy reports by simple performance heat maps – yes, pictures, literally replacing thousands of words.

Key Change for High Performance?

A shift in focus from process to outcomes. Burn the forms. With technology finally up to the task of producing meaningful information, managers can turn their attention to driving performance outcomes rather than being bogged down in laborious processes.

The relationship between people and their technology

On demand. Ubiquitous. Better, faster, cheaper.

It’s really not so long ago that your only likely encounter with a computer was when you went to work, laptops were expensive and rare, and mobile devices were pagers and Walkmans. Today, can you even imagine getting past 10:00 a.m. without having accessed a myriad of your online applications? We work online, shop online, socialize online, we are connected 24/7 – online.

Enterprise technologies are not far behind. Perhaps you are still in a workplace that restricts or bans social media, but they are in decline. Perhaps your organization refuses cloud-based applications for privacy or security reasons, but they are in decline. The fact is: organizations that try to block out the world simply ostracize themselves. And they are in decline.

Key Change for High Performance?


An agile, social and mobile work environment. You will set dynamic goals and adjust them in response to change; your manager will provide just-in-time coaching wherever you are; skills and knowledge you need will be recommended and streamed to you; your performance journal will continuously capture and cluster feedback, ideas and suggestions from your peers and customers; your formal annual performance review will be permanently deleted from your calendar…and you will finally be in a position to manage your own career.

-- The End --

Lazy HR Professional Series: Performance Management System / Appraisal / Processes

09 August 2014, Singapore: Another research on the various articles on 'Performance Management', not limiting to system but other topics like checklist, processes, concept, etc. 

Just click the hyperlink:









(source: http://www.cdc.gov/stltpublichealth/performance/Definitions.html)

-- The End --

Friday, August 8, 2014

Lazy HR Professional Series: Succession Planning Process

08 August 2014, Singapore: If you are looking for some reference material to draft your organization succession planning and just for your Master's course assignment - just click the hyperlink: -







I hope the above resources will be helpful to your work ... or just for the fun of reading ... KNOWLEDGE IS POWER


(source: https://www.opm.gov)


-- The End --  

The Dangers Of Complacent Leadership

08 August 2014, Singapore: Yesterday, one of my colleagues reminded me that I have not been posting articles at my HR blog since May. I guess it is a good time to share this article, it is a reminder to potential HR Leaders and myself on "The Dangers of Complacent Leadership" by Glenn Llopis.

Click the hyperlink for the source:

Glenn Llopis
The Dangers Of Complacent Leadership

It’s easy for MARKET leaders to grow complacent when they feel  the alternative is to take two steps back before taking one step forward in  an effort to find their footing in today’s changing terrain. As a result, larger corporations in particular become more vulnerable to competitive pressures because they lose strategic focus and don’t see the opportunities their emerging competitors are seeing and seizing.

Changing times require a change in one’s LEADERSHIP STYLE and approach. Here are a few early warning signs to avoid the dangers of complacent leadership.

1.  Fear Settles In

When leaders begin to fear what is required to move the company’s agenda forward – this is cause for concern.  For example, many leaders don’t want to manage through the political and/or employee dynamics that are associated with changing times for fear of being left exposed and placed in a vulnerable position.

While many leaders may not admit to being fearful, it is becoming more common as the MARKET becomes more uncertain.  As a leader, uncertainty must become your best friend and you must tackle it head on by anticipating the unexpected and taking action to solve for what lies ahead rather than waiting for others to determine your fate.  Adversity can make or break you, but it primarily reveals you. Fear is a by-product of not always knowing what the consequences of your actions will be in a changing marketplace.

The more complacent you are as a leader, the more unpredictable the environment becomes and your ability to control and lead  in it.

2.  Attention to DETAIL Fades

When the pressures mount, details fade.  This is an early warning SIGN that complacency is kicking in.  Managing the DETAILS is critical to maintaining your focus and keeping your eyes locked-in on the moving parts around you.

You can see the lack of attention to detail in meetings and in a leader’s preparation – or lack thereof.  When leaders cut corners, quality erodes.  If they don’t know how to manage speed in execution, their good intentions can spiral out of control and they can potentially create negative consequences for the team and organization they serve.

The devil is in the DETAILS.  Don’t allow them to escape by becoming a complacent leader.

3.  Tension Unknowingly Begins to Mount

When leaders grow fearful of becoming exposed and begin to lose the required attention to detail to effectively perform, they begin to unknowingly create tension with others. When this happens, leaders lose executive presence, and become disruptive and restless from the mounting demands of their growing complacency – which begins to reverberate throughout the rest of the team and amongst their colleagues.

Leaders are always in the spotlight and collectively everyone is WATCHING everything they say and do. Don’t allow complacency to disrupt your momentum.

4.  Reactive Thinking

Leaders are expected to be proactive and timely with their decisions, their outlook for the business, and the potential of their people.  When leaders are complacent, they become slower, less decisive, they begin to accumulate bad habits and the lens with which they see through gets blurry and full of blind spots. As such, over the COURSE of time they become reactive rather than proactive to the opportunities that are right in front of them.

Complacency can cloud a leader’s thinking – making it more likely for them to miss a potential OPPORTUNITY

5.  Stop Leading

Complacency can reach a point where a leader begins to follow more than lead.  Over time, complacent leaders begin to play it too safe — losing respect, trust and loyalty from their employees as well as other leaders in the organization.  When this happens, they begin to lose confidence in their own abilities, trust in themselves and in others.  This behavioral shift makes them feel too vulnerable to lead and more COMFORTABLE following.

Complacency can mark the end of a leader’s reign when people stop valuing and respecting their authority.

Leadership expert Warren Bennis, who passed away last week and wrote one of the most popular BOOKS on leadership, “On Becoming a Leader,” was well ahead of his time when it came to not giving in to the dangers of becoming a complacent leader. These are the types of leaders who “get companies stuck in outmoded ways of doing things while the world changed around them,” he said, according to his obituary in the LA Times, 8/3/2014.


Looking at things from this point of view, complacency makes you more of a manager than a leader. And as he often said: “The manager does things right and has their eye on the bottom line; the leader does the right thing and has their eye on the horizon.”

-- The End --



Wednesday, May 7, 2014

It's Time to Redesign HR by Josh Bersin

06 May 2014, Singapore: This article caught my attention - click the hyperlink




The End

Friday, April 25, 2014

What’s the Difference Between Mentoring and Coaching?

25 April 2014, Singapore: I would like to share this article from one of my LinkedIn forum 'Talent Management'. The article was written by Tessa Hilson-Greener, Interim HRD, Executive Education Consultant

***************
Mentoring and coaching are not the same. What contributes to the confusion of the difference between the two is that a coach and mentor often perform their work using similar skills sets, such as strong interpersonal and communication skills. 


Effective mentors (as well as effective supervisors, managers, and executives - leaders of all kinds) also use effective coaching skills. Mentors usually reside within the same organization as the person being mentored. Coaches, on the other hand, are more often than not external to the organization, however, there are some internal coaches when the company is forward thinking in developing a culture of self development utilising a coaching philosophy. 

Mentoring is a learning relationship between two people. It requires trust, commitment and emotional engagement. It involves listening, questioning, challenge and support. It has a definite time scale. It is concerned with implications beyond task and It focuses on skills and performance and the agenda is set by learner. 

Some Benefits: 
  • Support in transitions 
  • Providing a sounding board and feedback 
  • Expanded Personal and business network and additional learning resources 
  • Experience of another persons career journey, culture, status and gender 
  • A safe space to sound out ideas and gain support 
  • Access to information about how the organisation works 
  • A source of stretch and challenge 
  • Can bring individuals closer together by sharing knowledge, skills and experiences so that all parties learn from others to build a new approach 
  • Make the most of work-related opportunities to learn from real situations 

Coaching is a structured interaction between two people who are in a trusting and honest relationship. Coaching focuses on capability and potential. The agenda is set by or with the coach It typically addresses short-term needs. Coaching is not training because it is centred on the coachee finding their own answers with a professional guide. Coaching is results-orientated following a process that enables the participants to find constructive solutions in a productive time-frame. Coaching is a practical, confidential and forward looking activity that enables the individuals to explore their ideas with a qualified professional to achieve outstanding results. 

Some Benefits: 
  • Learn from those you know and trust 
  • Take it at your own pace and form a one-to-one relationship 
  • Have input over what and how you learn related to the agenda 
  • Develop the skills needed for the present job as well as future jobs 
  • Find an outlet to express ideas and concerns and then define clear actions 
  • Transfer the learning to new situations in a set time-frame 
  • Receive structured development from a trained manager or coach 
  • Promote a climate of continuous learning, support and ownership 
  • Make the most of work-related opportunities to learn from real situations 
  • Reduce time spent away from work while attending courses or workshops 
  • Aid the transfer of learning to the work situation 
  • Provide cost-effective ways of developing people in a more customized way 
  • Ensure high quality management advice and support is consistent 

When to implement mentoring and coaching? They both should be part of an overall learning strategy as both are valuable in encouraging self development and when managed effectively have a valuable impact on performance capability and a positive impact on the overall self development of people.

The End
***************

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Is Handwriting Analysis a Dying Skills?

13 April 2014 - Singapore: Today, I went to the local community library and saw a handwriting analysis book by Marc Seifer, PhD. I flip a few pages and straight away I took it to the 'load machine' to record it under my name.

Recalling back, each time I share my knowledge about 'handwriting analysis' or 'graphology' - the first usual respond I got is .... "Mr. Liew ... now days people type more, do you think handwriting analysis is still relevant?"

I was introduced to handwriting analysis back in the mid 1990s - a headhunter from TOA shared her knowledge with and gave me a quick interpretation of my handwriting ... it was accurate about my personality. Later, another headhunter from HRnet One, shared with me that he use handwriting analysis to analyse the personality profile of his candidates. This really got me hooked to handwriting analysis but during the 90s, there wasn't any reading material on handwriting analysis. 

My break came when my French boss asked me to select a training that will help me in my daily HR tasks ... the rest was history ... the 2 days course on handwriting analysis cost my company RM1750 and this is in the mid 1990s. It was very expensive to invest on a young HR Officer like me. During the course ... my course-mates were from the Singapore & Malaysia police force, and the petroleum companies e.g., Petronas, LNG, SHELL, etc.

To keep it short - I just wanted to share some of the reading material available and hope the HR professional from the "Gen Y" age group  will consider picking up the skills.





Click the hyperlink:



The End

Saturday, April 5, 2014

BBC. com: Resume or CV? A Global Guide

05 April 2014, Singapore: Came across this article via LinkedIn. It is an interesting reading ... Great if you are a HR professional ... at least you will be able to explain "Resume" and "CV".

Click the hyperlink: 
BBC.com : Resume or CV! A Global Guide

Note: Do remember to click the pictures as it is linked the other section of the article. Happy reading ... knowledge is power!

Summary: In USA ... they call it resume ... keep it short by elaborate!! In Europe and Latin America ... they call it CV


-The End-